Re: Zetatalk -The Noble Lie

John Jones wrote:

> 
> ABC wrote in message <[email protected]>
>> Michael Cunningham wrote:
>>
>> > John Jones wrote:
>> >> On today's #zetatalk IRC Channel, Nancy admitted to her flock
>> >> that her imaginary Zeta friends have been telling them lies since
>> >> 1995.  Here's a condensed version:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [14:30] <NancyL> ZT: If Nancy is viewed as being perceived as
>> >>   accurate, believable, then a hundred times more disinfo sites and
>> >>   agents would be sent forth to counter this than have actually be
>> >>   dispatched.
>> >> [14:31] <NancyL> ZT: Thus, it is a clever maneuver, on our part,
>> >>   and with Nancy's cooperation, to do a Columbo, act befuddled,
>> >>   appear to make a slip, on occasion.
>> >> [14:31] <NancyL> ZT:  These slips are carefully placed so as to
>> >>   placate the establishment, but not confuse the readership who is
>> >>   reading with BROAD interest, and looking at the overall trends.
>> >>
>> >> (Zeta's weren't wrong - they were deliberately spreading
>> >> disinformation.)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [14:33] <NancyL> ZT: Early in the game the Hale-Bopp ploy was
>> >>   used, and in truth Nancy was under the impression until late in
>> >>   the game that there WAS no comet!
>> >>
>> >> (Nancy was duped by her maginary zeta friends)
>> >>
>> >> [14:37] <NancyL> ZTL The group wanting to have the public look in
>> >>   the OPPOSITE direction of Orion was placated, however, as Nancy
>> >>   steadfastly maintained, in NancyTalk, that there was no Hale-Bopp
>> >>   comet.
>> >> [14:38] <NancyL> ZT: Then in 1996, we slipped in a warning in
>> >>   ZetaTalk that they were lining the false/fake orbit up with the
>> >>   orbit of a REAL comet, and when this emerged in 1997, WE, the
>> >>   Zetas, were not wrong.
>> >> [14:38] <NancyL> ZT: Nancy was a bit miffed at having been used
>> >>   in this manner, but the benefit soon dawned upon her.
>> >> [14:38] <NancyL> ZT: In like manner, in the early days of Planet
>> >>   X sightings, we laid out trip points to placate the
>> >>   establishement.
>> >> [14:39] <NancyL> ZT: It was a Mag 2, and at the time when
>> >>   ZetaTalk was building international acclaim due to its utter
>> >>   accuracy on all other issues, THIS simply point placated NASA and
>> >>   the arrogant elite.
>> >>
>> >> Aha! Zetatalk - the Noble Lie
>> >>
>> >> [14:39] <NancyL> ZT: And how would Nancy and ZetaTalk ever
>> >>   recover from this?  They presumed this a fatal error.
>> >> [14:40] <NancyL> ZT: When the sightings began in early 2001, this
>> >>   was the cry, the Magnitude issue, and our explanations that OUR
>> >>   eyes could see it and OUR equipment register it as a Mag 2 deemed
>> >>   inadequate.
>> >>
>> >> It's magnitude 2 to the Zetan eye?  How interesting that they
>> >> would give you information that would useless. Typical, but
>> >> interesting.
>> >>
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >> [14:44] <TerrorDactyl> so which bits of your 100 per cent
>> >>   accuracy record are purposeful mistakes?? Is May 2003 a clever
>> >>   maneuver on your part too? Wait til sci.astro get their hands on
>> >>   this, you've dug your own grave Nancy
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [14:45] <blindfaith> So, how do we know the Zetas aren't lying
>> >>   about the whole premise of Planet X, if they lied intentionally
>> >>   in the past?
>> >>
>> >> "The emperor has no clothes!"
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [14:46] <TerrorDactyl> seriously though, you expect right minded
>> >>   people to follow that as a reason for your mistakes??
>> >>
>> >> [14:47] <NancyL> BlindFaith, please read ZT and perceive the
>> >>   mission.  Do you know what a white lie is?
>> >>
>> >> 14:48] <TerrorDactyl> any other predictions that are clever
>> >>   manuevers by the zetas we need to know about?
>> >>
>> >> [14:49] <seeker> i hardly think I'll ever apologize to you
>> >>   nancy.. i believe it's you who owes a great many people an apology
>> >>
>> >> [14:52] <TerrorDactyl> you know, nutcases always trip themselves
>> >>   up eventually
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Summation:  The Zetas have never been wrong, they've been lying
>> >> to everyone for our own good.
>> >
>> > No need to snip that! Damn! I missed another fine session! I bet that
>> > set the Zetatalk and tt-watch crowd back on their heels! I'd be pissed
>> > too if she can't stick to one story (no matter how much of a lie it is!).
>> >
>> > So much for 100% Zeta accuracy... or was that a little white lie too?
>> >
>>
>> Very interesting stuff. It's hard to know for sure whether this stuff is
>> really true or is some type of I don't know what.
> 
> No.  There's nothing hard about it.  Nancy has admitted that
> parts of Zetatalk are deliberate lies. She admitted that the
> zetas lied to her, and they lied to the rest of her accolytes.
> 
> QED:  Nancy and her imaginary zeta friends are liars and have no
> credibility.
> 
> Next questions?
> 

John, you've got it all wrong. You see, the establishment, NASA, wealthy 
people in power, they are to be feared, my man. You can't just make them 
unhappy. You have to placate them. While at the same time acheiving the 
goals you need. Nancy has done this.

>> If it is true, then what
>> does that mean? We can't just reject the entire zetatalk I guess just
>> because they are opening up a little. But then again we would like to know
>> exactly what they aren't being truthful about, right Michael?
> 
> It means we can't believe a goddamn thing you or your imaginary
> zeta friends tell us, ABC/Nancy.  That much should be clear to
> everyone by now.

John, how much did the hale bopp issue mean to the average man anyway? Not 
much. it didn't affect their quality of life, right? Therefore, I submit to 
you that no harm was done to most people and more good was accomplished 
through placating the establishment.

Now it's your turn to reply :-)