Re: Analysis of PX images Oct 9 2002

Greetings;

The reason I am using the freeware programs Cadet Calibration & Avis Fits
Viewer, is so that anyone anywhere can replicate my findings and determine the truth
of my statements using the public domain fits files available at
http://www.zetatalk.com/teams/tteam342.htm for free.

Being able to afford costly programs to be able to make a determination on
this point is not an issue.

All it takes is the initiative to look for themselves.

In this manner, disputes over qualifications and abilities are removed as
issues, as the proof is observable to each and every one.

My findings maybe arguable at this point, but will become less so as time
passes. And as each new set of images becomes available, my results will be
duplicated by others.

I believe this course of action is correct.

Stay tuned ;)

J.William Dell

JTRIV wrote in message <[email protected]>
> Have you ever done any image analysis before?
>
> Have you studied other images to really understand what you
> should be looking for?
>
> Do you understand how combining FITS files works and why
> certain settings are required?
>
> These are rhetorical questions, I saw from your post in
> tt-watch that you first tried working with FITS files just 2
> weeks ago. Possibly if you knew what you were doing you
> would know the difference between a pixel defect and a
> planet.
>
> Amazing...
>
> Jim
> http://www.planet-x.150m.com/
>
> J.William Dell wrote:
>>
>> Raw Data and Information available for those who wish to look themselves,
>>
>> http://www.zetatalk.com/teams/tteam342.htm
>>
>> Computer programs required
>>
>> Cadet Calibration Software - freeware
>> http://www.terra.es/personal2/oscarcj/introeng.htm
>>
>> Avis Fits File Viewers - freeware
>> http://www.sira.it/msb/avis.htm
>>
>> Findings:
>> Images of Planet X Oct 4 2002
>>
>> I have found the answers given on Oct. 5,2002 by the Zetas to be very
>> helpful in confirming what appears on the images.
>>
>> Working to the request of the Zeta's, based on the following quote, I give
>> my opinion on the best image of PX.
>>
>> Quote from Zetatalk Q & A Oct. 5,2002
>> (NancyL) ZT: Suffice it to say that you should look for the STRONGEST red
>> object in accordance with what is expected in coordinates motion, and in
>> relation to the white light object, and in accordance with latitude and time
>> of exposure, etc.
>>
>> The Summary images of Oct 4,2002 show 4 new candidates on it.
>> Two are recognized by Avis Fits Viewer.
>>
>> 1) Here is my reasoning, to support the candidate slightly above the Sept
>>    21,2002 announced PX.
>>    Reasons to support main candidate located on Summary image of Oct 4,2002
>>    (located slightly above the Steves Candidate of Sept 21,2002 Summary
>>    image)
>>
>> a) This object shows up on the Summary image of Oct. 4 2002.
>>    Avis Fits File Viewer recognizes this object on the Summary image.
>>    When referencing Frame 4 (where the object appears), it is noted that 2
>>    objects are recognized by Avis Fits Viewer. The PX object and (slightly
>>    below and to the left) a very faint star, which I believe is on the DSS
>>    comparison images.
>>    Note: Steve Havas has suggested that the DSS star is further left and this
>>    Avis recognized object maybe a strong ghost image or something else.
>>
>> b) According to movement chart, with coordinate change, PX should move left
>>    on image and very slightly down. This object has moved up and left when
>>    compared with Sept 21,2002 red object location. The other Avis Fits viewer
>>    recognized candidate has moved down and right significantly.
>>
>> c) Given the new information on refraction angle (by Zeta's on Chat Oct
>>    5,2002)
>>    The closing distance of PX over the past 12 days would mean the angle of
>>    refraction is decreasing.
>>    Logically, over time, we should see the red image move closer to the true
>>    coordinates. (the white light image)
>>    Therefore, the Oct. 4, 2002 pictures should show the object above it's Sept
>>    21 image.
>>
>> Quote on refraction from Q & A Zetatalk Chat Oct 5,2002
>>   (NancyL) ZT: Until Planet X reaches the edge of the solar system, the orbit
>>     of Pluto or thereabouts, it will continue to present TWO objects, both
>>     increasingly large and bright as the months pass.
>>   (NancyL) ZT: It is when the distance is such that LITTLE bending occurs that
>>     they will blend, become one object, a gradual progression of becoming closer
>>     and closer in images and scopes.
>>
>> d)We have moved past the solstice, 9/21, and on 10/4 the light from Px came
>>   almost directly FROM the East, NOT over the Equator.
>>   On 9/21 it was much closer TO the Equator, so had to BEND down more.
>>   Therefore, PX in the Oct 4 2002 images should be above the Sept 21 2002
>>   location
>>
>> 2) Confirmation of Planet X
>>   Findings to date;
>>   Steve Havas has captured PX on film according to directions by Zeta's, on
>>   both occasions at the general coordinates.
>>   a) The Summary image of Sept 21 2002 shows an object known as Steves
>>      Candidate and this has been confirmed by Zeta's.
>>   b) The Summary image of Oct 4 2002 shows an object slightly above Steves
>>      Candidate.
>>   Therefore, the PX object is now confirmed, by appearing on both the Summary
>>   image of Sept 21 2002 and the Summary image of Oct 4 2002.
>>
>> Conclusions;
>> 1) based on summary image picking up object, refraction angle change due to
>>    distance covered over last 12 days, predicted movement by Zeta's,earth
>>    position at time of imaging, and on looking for most intense red object on
>>    film.
>>    I conclude that the new Image of Planet X of Oct. 4,2002 is located just
>>    above the Sept. 21,2002 PX location as seen on the Summary images of the two
>>    dates.
>>
>> 2) The PX object is now confirmed by the fact of it having been imaged on
>>    two different occasions in the coordinate area specified by the Zeta's.
>>
>> 3) Based on the statements by the Zeta's on refraction, we can now
>>    confidently predict that the next images ( assuming same location and angle
>>    of viewing) will show the red light image closer to the true
>>    coordinates(white light) of PX .
>>
>> Submitted
>> J.William Dell