IMO's Images have Upped the Ante for Nancy and Company

In Article <[email protected]> RT wrote:
> Between November of 2001 and January 2002 I 
> acted as liaison between the astronomer I AM 
> OPENMINDED and Nancy of ZetaTalk.   I 
> provided IMO with the 'special' southeast 
> coordinates  obtained from  Nancy and her
> presumed Zeta cohorts. ... Therefore I wouldn't 
> give much credibility to Pierre and the bogus 
> interpretations of his images.  

Speaking up Upping the Ante, Pierre did just that!  He provided original
CCD .FITS files from the infrared camera, stamped by the signature of
the observatory, Haute-Provence.  THIS is the measure by which
anyone else's proferring will be measured.  

> But what of the others?  Mark Hazelwood ..  has 
> anyone aside from myself picked up a telephone to 
> speak with Mr. Hazelwood?  I have done so twice 
> and on both occasions he was more interested in 
> selling me his book then in offering any credible
> evidence.  I am not a supporter of Nancy but even 
> I have to ask; what are these two people  doing on 
> the same page?  Hazelwood's book is a blatant rip 
> off of ZetaTalk and it should be obvious that he is 
> in it for the money. 

On this we agree.  Please DO read my warning about giving Hazelwood
money.  He was kicked out of the Troubled Times discussion groups
promptly, over two years ago, for blatantly soliciting money, and from a
description of his private e-mail discussions, sounds more like a money
lauderer than anything.  Good luck FINDING any money given to him for
establishing a safe place and stocking it with goods - its likely to
have been moved through off-shore accounts and GONE without a trace.
(http://www.zetatalk.com/index/px2003.htm)

> IMO is the real deal and to date no one, and I will repeat, 
> NO ONE has brought forth more conclusive evidence that 
> X does not mark the spot then IMO.  

Did he provide the original CCD .FITS file from the infrared camera?  
(http://www.zetatalk.com/teams/rogue/haute006.htm)

He's not stepped up the Pierre's standard, yet.  
(http://membres.lycos.fr/dcorb/N/)

As The Small Kahuna used to say, it's not enough to say "I saw it" or "I
didn't see it" or "I imaged it and it ain't there".  Regardless of
conclusion, we need to see the original camera image.