Re: Planet X: Changing the PAST?

In Article  <[email protected]> David Tholen wrote:
> Steve Havas writes:
>> Also, the new spot I noticed on the DSSII is LOWER 
>> than the new spot on the Jan 19, 2002 image.
> 
> Out of curiosity, Havas, why are you spending so much 
> time looking at "spots" that are nowhere near magnitude 11?  
> It's like digging through a whole boxful of ping-pong balls 
> trying to find a basketball.

Trying to change the focus of the post, Dave?  

The FASCINATION is, of course, watching the DSS and NEAT Star Charts,
out there as guides for the little guy to download and compare against,
being changed before their eyes.  Images taken long ago, and SUDDENLY,
just since the announcement of the Jan 19th imaging and discovery of a
round blob of infrared “noise” dropping the appropriate number of Dec
from the Jan 5th imaging and discovery of a round blob of infrared
“noise” not on the star charts.  Errors inserted in the doctoring such
that the viewer has problems with the image!  

It’s just fascinating watching you’all struggle with what to SAY, Dave!
Don’t be concerned that these bastions of integrity, the star charts,
are being changed to make the PAST look different?  But we can trust
you’all on all other matters, right?  You’ve got our interests at heart,
right?  You, the readership, out there with your babes, your toddlers,
your pregnant wife - you’re not on the short list.  NASA honchos are. 
Bush family certainly is.  Perhaps in taking a “vacation” just after the
Jan 19th images were announced, with a FITS files to back this up as a
NEW object, Dave assumed he’d be on the short list too. Hey Dave, you
can trust this crowd!  They’re very caring folks!  They don’t lie or
perpetrate a coverup!  They let the whole world see what the Hubble
sees, right off the reel, and this is because there’s nothing to hide!

Now, I expect with the spotlight of attention Steve Havas and his
EXCELLENT sense of timing brought down on this matter, that the orginal,
unaltered, star charts will be reinstated.  Then Steve will be called a
liar (again), and anyone else in the world who has pulled down what
Steve was pointing to, and compared to star charts they happened to have
in their possession, and noticed that INDEED, something fishy was going
on, will also be called a liar. That would once again leave open the
question of what it IS, that round moving “noise” showing up on those
infrared charts, moving in accordance with the Zeta prediction way last
November.  

Comets don’t emit heat.  
Novas don’t move those distances when supposedly far away.
Leaving a “self-luminating inbound planet close at hand” as the explanation.