Re: Planet X VIEWING, Restated

In Article <[email protected]> David Tholen wrote:
>> and precludes a significant increase in size until that 
>> time (it is only about 3 times the size of Pluto in your 
>> scopes at this time).
>
> Thus it cannot be "diffuse", contrary to your other claims.

Steve Havas raised an interesting question to the Zetas during the
weekly IRC Live ZetaTalk chats last Saturday, Dec 1st.  The question,
and answer, show another reason (other than the light coming evenly from
the entire surface vs the intense pinpoint of light from a star) for
"diffuse" being the proper term.  Below, that portion of the chat. 

(NancyL) SIGHTING PX
(NancyL) 1. how much would P-X's tail and orbiting debris affect its
apparent size when viewing or imaging.
(NancyL) ZT: Steve has asked whether what he sighted, at Vancouver, was
PX or PX enhanced by its tail and moons.
(NancyL) ZT: As the story of Pluto's discovery tells, Moons can increase
the size of a small object, creating the illusion of a LARGER object.
(NancyL) ZT: Indeed, PX's Moons do not circle it while out in space and
moving, but trail behind.
(NancyL) ZT: They do not simply line up behind in a straight line, but
twirl, moving ABOUT each other in the manner whirlwinds or tornadoes do.
(NancyL) ZT: Thus, viewing PX from the front, as it approaches, one
would see not only PX but a halo of moving Moons.
(NancyL) ZT: In that PX also is surrounded by magnetic iron ore dust,
there is reflection of light from this dust.
(NancyL) ZT: When PX becomes visible from Earth, to those gazing up from
their yards weeks ahead of the shift, it will be seen as a red object
because of this dust.
(NancyL) ZT: Light from PX is thus bounced FROM the dust cloud, creating
the illusion of a larger red object approaching.
(NancyL) ZT: To answer Steve's question directly, he was seeing MORE
than PX in his sights, last April.
(NancyL) End ZT
(NancyL) Follow-on questions?