Re: The Genesis of Spin

In Article <[email protected]> Astrodomesam wrote:
> I am searching for current theories and opinions as to 
> what physical mechanisms impart/cause the spin of 
> planetary bodies on an axis, the motion of planetary 
> bodies around the sun, the motion of galaxies
> revolving around their central cores.

Posing the question of why we have SPIN, at all, much less spin that
affects suns and planets (rotation), solar systems (ecliptic planes),
and glaxies that seem to be consistent far outside of a random pattern.
The answers to this man's questions have variously been:

3. MAGNETISM: Magnetic alignment is influencing glaxies to spin in
   accordance with magnetic fields. This begs the question of how magnetic
   fields can reach between galaxies, when they diminish rapidly upon
   distance.  How could this be the dominant force? 

In Article  <[email protected]> Martin Hardcastle wrote:
> There certainly are galactic magnetic fields which are 
> aligned on large scales in our own Galaxy and in other
> spirals; you can observe this by looking at the polarization
> of synchrotron radiation.

Existing ZetaTalk on magnetism as particle flow, and defining this flow
as a RETURN to the opposite pole, the path of least resistance in this
being going round to the NEAREST pole.  Outside of planets influencing
each other, as neighbors, galactic influences seem unlikely.  

    Magnetism is the palpable, measurable effect of a 
    subatomic particle not yet delineated by man. In fact, 
    there are several dozen sub-atomic particles involved, 
    out of the 387 involved in what humans assume to be 
    simply the flow of electrons. Where electric current 
    can be made to flow in any direction, the path of least
    resistance, magnetic flow seems to be very single 
    minded. In fact, it is also going in the path of least 
    resistance, as can be seen when one understands the 
    path and what constitutes resistance for magnetic flow.
    Unlike electricity, which only occasionally flows in 
    nature, the flowing sub-atomic particles that 
    constitute a magnetic field are constantly flowing. 
    This is the natural state, to be in motion. The path of 
    least resistance, therefore, is to go with the flow, and 
    the flow is determined by the biggest bully in the 
    vicinity. 

    A single atom of iron, isolated, will establish the direction
    of flow based on the tightly orbiting electron particles, of 
    which there are hundreds of sub-types. These tight orbits 
    arrange themselves in a manner not unlike the planets 
    around a sun, but the field, of course, is much more 
    crowded. Given the fairly static number of these particles 
    that will hang around an iron ore nucleus, the orbiting 
    swirl may have a rhythm, rather than a steady hum. Put 
    3 groups of 3 into a cycle of 10 and you have whomp 
    whomp whomp pause. Should the cycle, based on the 
    nucleus and the electron sub-atomic particles it attracts
    due to its size and composition, be 4 groups of 3 in a 
    cycle of 12, you would have whomp whomp whomp 
    whomp. The steady hum of the second cycle does not 
    lack a magnetic flow, it is just diffuse. The irregular 
    cycle in the first example finds the magnetic flow 
    escaping during the pause. Being attracted again to the 
    best partner in the vicinity, the single iron atom, the
    magnetic sub-atomic particles will circle around, taking
    the path of least resistance which of course is on the other
    side of the atom from the outward flow.
        ZetaTalk™, Ferromagnetism
            (http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s66.htm)