Re: Pole Shifts vs Ice Ages (Revisited)

In Article  <[email protected]> Pushenipol wrote:
> Does a compass show such thing ?

Yes.  Molten lava records the magnetic orientation of the core at the
time, and once hardened retains that.  Thus, there is some dramatic
evidence of times when the crust moved rapidly during pole shifts. 
Steens Mountain is one.  

Almost Inconceivable Changes in the Geomagnetic Field,
Science Frontiers #101 Sep-Oct 1995.
    The three researchers, though, continued their labors at 
    Steens Mountain and have now offered additional, even 
    more impressive data. They now find that the 
    geomagnetic field probably shifted as much as 6° in a 
    single day. Their work has been carried forward so 
    professionally and meticulously that other scientists are
    finding their conclusions harder and harder to dismiss. 
    Instead, the search is on for explanations of the rapid 
    field changes. Three possibilities have been advanced -
    all of them unpalatable to geophysicists: 
     - The Steens Mountain rocks are not faithful recorders
       of the main geomagnetic field. Should this be actually 
       so, the whole field of paleomagnetism, including plate
       tectonics, is undermined, for it depends upon similar 
       measurements. 
     - The earth's molten core can change rapidly, at least 
       in some regions, in response to forces still unrecognized.
       This, of course, is not really a satisfying "explanation." 
     - The dynamo theory of the origin of the geomagnetic 
       field is incorrect.

And we are currently experiencing magnetic diffusion.  Please note in
the quote below, from a geologist, on one of our Troubled Times pages,
the "historic high".  Comes pretty close to the mid-point of a 3,600
year cycle for a passage of Planet X.

    mathematical analyses of the observations, which are 
    routinely done every few years, show an overall 
    decrease in what is called the "dipole moment"
    of the magnetic field. (See for example, C.E. Barton, 
    Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, v 49, 
    123-148, 1997.) This decrease is approximately 
    linear, not exponential. If it were to continue, the 
    dipole moment would become zero in about 1250 
    years, but Barton points out that the dipole appears 
    to be recovering from an historic high that occured 
    about 2000 years ago

And what the Zetas have to say about that:

    Where some scientists state that the Earth's magnetic 
    field has been weakening lately, this is certainly not 
    the case. They misunderstand. The Earth's magnetic 
    field is not weakening, it is changing course or 
    direction, and thus scattered does not register on their
    instruments in the same old way. This is an early 
    indicator of the great confusion that [Planet X] will 
    have on the Earth, soon, during the pole shift. ... Even
    during quiescent times the liquid rock that lies under 
    the crusted surface of the Earth moves about, just as 
    currents move in the oceans. ... Currents and tides 
    develop in the molten rock, and this is either gentle 
    and regular or vigorous and given to sudden spurts. 
    The dispersing of the Earth's magnetic alignment is 
    just another indicator of this phenomena.
        ZetaTalk™, Magnetic Field
            (http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s05.htm)