Re: Some Thoughts on Planet X
In Article <992673315.430839@sj-nntpcache-3> Andy Francke wrote:
> In Article <[email protected]>
>> I refer you, for brevity, to the reports linked from the
>> Rogue Planet TEAM page at
>> http://www.zetatalk.com/teams/tteam342.htm
>
> Whatever anybody saw, galaxy (and there are three galaxies
> within 1/2 degree of those coordinates, contrary to the claim
> put forward by the reports), or comet, or star, it was not the
> magnitude you described.
To make the statement that it was not the magnitude you described is
making the statement that ONLY objects already in the star charts would
have been there. Andy has an open mind, and apparently believes that
NASA et al would not lie to him, JFK and Iran Contra not withstanding.
Andy is a good little boy, and believes what those in authority tell
him. Period.
For the Lowell sighting, done on April 1, 2001, the following
coordinates were used:
RA 5.151245 Dec 16.55743 on April 1, 2001
Subject: [tt-watch] Lowell Sighting (was: Basis for a poleshift)
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 21:29:24 -0000
I am the person who viewed an object on the night of April 1st
at the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, AZ. I am posting this
message because it has recently been suggested that my
sighting was a hoax. It was not a hoax. I was there and I saw
SOMEthing extremely close to the coordinates I recieved from
Nancy Lieder which I requested from her specifically for that
evening. There were 6 people there that night. Three of us,
including the telescope operator (who by his own admission is
not an astronomer but has been operating the telescopes at
Lowell for the past 3 years) saw the object. I don't know what
the object was. The operator didn't know what the object was.
The object was described BY THE OPERATOR as diffuse and
of approximate magnitude 11. I have asked two professional
astronomers what they thought the object might be based on
the coordinates where it was found and the description (both
of which come from the telescope operator). The reply from
the first can be found here [on this page]. Here is the
previously unpublished response of the second astronomer:
<begin response>
[A mutual friend] has passed along your note to him about
an object or "something" found in northern Orion in April.
As you were advised by [astronomer 1], there is nothing
obvious closely matching your description at the nominal
location, although there are two open clusters in the region.
NGC 1807 is only a weak scattering of stars, but NGC 1817
is a fairly rich group of faint stars which would have spread
across the entire field of the 16-inch telescope even at its
lowest magnification. A look at the Digitized Sky Survey
images of the region
shows nothing diffuse within a quarter-degree radius from
the position you give. Your note suggests you were
expecting to see something at the location before you came
for the viewing session. Did you perhaps have a photograph
or make some visual observation prior to this time? In brief,
I don't know what you could have seen, and without some
sort of follow-up observation we can't determine whether
there was perhaps an unknown comet in the area at the time.
There were no known comets in the area at the time. The
area would have been well surveyed for moving targets by
the LINEAR project in New Mexico, so it is unlikely a
bright comet would have slipped past them.
Hope this helps, [astronomer 2]
<end response>
Subject: [tt-watch] My outing at Lowell Observatory
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 03:06:45 -0000
The next day, Monday April 2nd 2001, I emailed an
acquaintance who is a very experienced amateur astronomer.
I asked him how I might determine what the object that I
saw was and I gave him the description and coordinates.
Here is the relevant part of his reply:
I have checked this position WITHIN SEVERAL
DEGREES (my emphasis) and found no nebula,
galaxy or planetary nebula. I did, however, find the
following open clusters near your position:
NGC1807 051042 +163200 ~20 stars,
Mag: 7.0 diam:~16'/arc
NGC1817 051206 +164200 ~60 stars,
Mag: 7.7 diam:~17'/arc
I don't know how accurate the telescope's coordinate
readouts are, but with what you gave me, these are the only
objects that might fit your discription. Diffuse? Well, I
would think you would have been able to resolve the above
clusters into stars, yet, it may have been a thin overcast
and not possible. Often a tiny closly packed cluster of
stars (called an asterism) might have looked like a diffuse
object.
On the other hand, it may really have been a new comet
you stumbled upon! If my equipment were working, I could
easily verify if this object was the above clusters or not.
But, alas... :(
Note: it WAS partly cloudy that night but there were patches
of clear sky. The sky was clear in the direction we were looking.
I intend to follow up on this by reserving the telescope in
another couple of months or so. I also intend to ask my
astronomer acquaintance to use his equipment to verify as
soon as it is back online.