Re: Recent Planet X Sighting???

In Article <[email protected]> Greg Neill wrote:
> Given that the supposed planet is supposed to be at least 5 times the
> Sun-Pluto distance at this time, it could not appear as anything but a
> point source.
>     Angular Size = arctan(planet size / distance)
> Do the math, Sparky.

Ah, you've checked the Distance page in ZetaTalk, Greg.  In fact, it's
closer to the middle of the 18.74 times the Sun-Pluto distance to the
second foci at the present time, more like 9 times the Sun-Pluto
distance.  The Zetas wish to address this argument, taken as an
engagement of their statement by you, Greg (read the Rules of Engagement
in the Rules section of ZetaTalk re this.)

In Article <[email protected]> Christer Palmer wrote:
> What am i missing in this magnitude business, the WP -83 article says:
>
> "this mystery body, which is so cold it CASTS NO LIGHT and has never
> been seen by optical telescopes on Earth or in space" and "The mystery
> body was seen twice by the infrared satellite as it scanned the northern
> sky [...] when the satellite ran out of the SUPERCOLD HELIUM THAT
> ALLOWED ITS TELESCOPE TO SEE  the coldest bodies in the heavens."
> Is it possible to see such an object with a standard telescope!!?

    Precisely why an observatory is needed at this time, to view the
    planet.  Thank you Greg, for pointing out the ILLOG of the
    statements made by your allies, in the ZetaTalk put-down, that
    observation could be done by binoculars, by any amateur, that
    your mother has taken a peek and found nothing, etc.
    Observatory scopes do more than peek and locate, they ZOOM
    the object!  Else why populate them with a rapt public wanting to
    see the surface of Mars, for instance.  They are there for the ZOOM!
         ZetaTalk™