Article: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected](Nancy )
Subject: Re: LONG ELLIPSE ORBITS
Date: 20 Mar 1997 15:25:22 GMT
In article <[email protected]> Jim Scotti writes:
>>>> what is the difference WAY OUT IN SPACE, where the
>>>> comet, per your human theories, tracks SIDEWAYS
>>>> across the sky, for no reason, so as to return on the other
>>>> side of what you assume to be an ellipse!
>>>> ZetaTalk[TM]
>
>>> There is no magic involved here - its just simple physics
>>> and math.
>>> [email protected] (Jim Scotti)
>
>> What is the DIFFERENCE between what you call a
>> hyperbolic orbit that will not return, and an elliptical orbit!
>> ZetaTalk[TM]
>
> Once again, the difference between a hyperbolic and
> elliptical orbit is that an elliptical orbit is a closed orbit
> - the object continues around and returns to where it started.
> [email protected] (Jim Scotti)
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
Are you saying that OTHER than this, there are no other DIFFERENCES?
The curve is the same? The drawing out into an essentially straight line in the long stretch
is the same? We're sure your not saying that the eccentricity is the same. In fact, other than
the eccentricity, there is no difference. Is this not true? The curve around the Sun allows
you to speculate the far end of what you assume to be an ellipse.
Now, taking the nose AROUND the Sun, if this is broad it could be for what you call a
hyperbolic comet, one that would not return, or a short period comet! Taking the curve
going INTO the Sun, if this is almost straight this could be for what you call a hyperbolic
comet, never to return, or what you call a long period comet. Since we've answered the
question for you, Jim, perhaps you could address the part that is the focus of this subject.
WHY and HOW does what you call a long period comet do the turnaround out in space
such that it moves sideways, across a vast amount of space, to re-enter at a point other than
where it left!
(End ZetaTalk[TM])