| |
|
Article: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected](Nancy )
Subject: Re: BIZZARE WEATHER CHANGES
Date: 1 Mar 1997 20:06:31 GMT
In article: <[email protected]>
> For example, right now we are coming up toward the end
> of the current "Interglacial warm period", i.e.
approaching
> the beginning of the next Ice Age. How do we know this?
> Because Ice Ages have come and gone with some regularity,
> and the length of the warm periods is known. The average
> length is around 10,000 years, and we have gone 11,000
> or more into this one. ... According to an article in I
believe
> May, 1990 in Scientific American, there are three known
> astronomical cycles that scientists think should have
> something to do with the comings and goings of Ice Ages.
>
> One is a cycle .. with a period of something like 40,000
> years .. with a 26,000 year period .. with a period of
around
> 105,000 .. So we can expect another Ice Age to be coming
> along relatively soon, in geological terms.
> [email protected] (SPHINX Technologies)
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
This is nonsense, and is predicated on the assumption that the
Earth DOES NOT experience the poles sifts that her geography is
screaming loudly exists! Was modern man around to take
measurements during those periods mentioned? Utter theory versus
the reality that Velikovsky compiled, from the many scientific
studies that had been done by others, demonstrating that
cataclysmic changes happened to the Earth every 3,600 years on
the average. The thought that the Earth experiences such trauma,
the last during the Jewish Exodus so that YOU ARE DUE for another
any time now, is too terrifying to contemplate.
Ice ages are nothing more than the record left in a crust that
shifted TO the polar regions, and then shifted back on a
subsequent pole shift. Why does Greenland have so very much ICE,
when it is no farther north than Alaska or most of Canada? Does
this not go hand in hand with the flash frozen Mastodons found in
Siberia, with buttercups and grass in their stomachs? Greenland
was the pole, and shifted south, dragging Siberia north. For
those who say the crust cannot shift over the ocean of liquid
magma the plates ride upon, we would suggest a simple examination
of the many earthquakes that are doing just that! If it moves a
little, it can move a lot - same premise. If it moves in a local
area, it can just as easily move worldwide - same premise.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])
Some existing ZetaTalk on the subject.
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
ZetaTalk: Wandering Poles
The wandering poles attest to prior pole shifts but don't give a true picture, as many times poles situate over oceans or land that subsequently submerges, areas unexplored by modern man. Humans measure the significance of pole shifts by their variance from today's poles, where in fact the measure should be from the pole's placement prior to the shift. What is termed a wandering pole is mankind's best efforts to trace the placement of the poles, dating the record in hardened magma which captures the moment's magnetic alignment. The Ice Ages, occurring over northern Europe and America, are also written records of when poles were situated over those spots. Pole shifts can be as slight as a few degrees or close to 180 degrees, the most extreme case.
....
This finds the records of where the North and South Poles have
been, in the main, essentially close to their position at
present. Mankind is missing at least half the record, those
former poles which are now under water, but the pattern would not
look much different with these missing pieces added. Human
written and verbal history will not serve man well in preparation
for the forthcoming pole shift, as a shift as devastating as this
one will be has not occurred even within the past 50,000 years.
Even The Flood was merely the result of two minor shifts, back to
back - one to displace the South Pole so that partial melting and
softening started, and the second to break and drop the suspended
ice into the ocean.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])
All rights reserved: [email protected]
http://www.zetatalk.com