| |
|
Article: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected](Nancy )
Subject: Re: Hale-Bopp THEN and NOW
Date: 23 Feb 1997 18:08:08 GMT
In article: <[email protected]> Jim
Scotti writes:
>> (Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
>> What we anticipate is that you are either
>> 1. not using actual orbits or that you are
>> 2. inserting orbits of what you assume to be repeating
comets,
>> having no documentation on their last visit, and
>> 3. inserting the speculative period of these
speculatively
>> returning comets to cobble up the speculative return
date
>> of your fraud Hale-Bopp!
>>(End ZetaTalk[TM])
>
> The other readers of sci.astro understood what I said the
> first time
> [email protected] (Jim Scotti)
And new readers can gage this for themselves by looking into the archives. I've documented in web format the Zeta responses to all Jim's postings, so you can get the Message ID from those postings. They're located on the ZetaTalk web site at