Re: Hale-Bopp THEN and NOW (1-6)

Article: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected](Nancy )
Subject: Re: Hale-Bopp THEN and NOW (1-6)
Date: 18 Feb 1997 04:35:54 GMT

In article <[email protected]> Jim Scotti writes:
>> Everyone called the nucleus something different! How
>> could you track motion of the nucleus if no one was agreeing
>> whether it was a bright spot, a dark place, or whatever? This
>> is documented on the Troubled Times web site, and I've
>> included the page contents below:
>
> So there is, according to you, a giant conspiracy which has
> astronomers running around in trench coats threatening
> colleagues to be silent and none of them are coming forward?
> There have to be hundreds or even thousands of us in on this
> conspiracy. The conspiracy has to extend to the 10s of
> thousands of amateur astronomers all over who have looked
> at this comet since it was discovered.
> [email protected] (Jim Scotti)

You've got people looking at a STAR at the horizon. A star! There was a newspaper article a couple weeks ago here in San Francisco that instructs folks to, and I quote,

"To see Hale-Bopp now, Bay Area residents should find a dark place away from city lights and look directly east at about 6 a.m. .. It will look like a fuzzy star about 20 degrees above the horizon - or about three widths of one's own fist at arm's length. Because the comet's tail is extended roughly away from Earth during the current portion of its orbit, it does not yet look very long."

The clever orbit has the "comet" pointed in such a way that it won't ever GET a tail! So hey guys, if you saw a star on the horizon, Hale-Bopp is real. Sure!

Now I ask you, who WOULDN'T see something that looked like a star with those precise directions! The folks who try to follow the ephemerides just fall silent if they don't see it, sure the problem is THEIRS, as folks like David Knisley and David Tholen and NASA and JPL and all keep crowing about it! And for those folks who say they saw it, and even think they saw it, since the description of "it" was all over the map, hey, that's easy to say! Look at the number of Hindu's who saw the Gamesh statute weep tears of milk! Look how many folks see an image of Mother Mary at those places where she's supposed to appear. Look how many people thought Ronald Reagan was a great president and was leading the country even when word got out that he had to have tape marks on the floor on the way to the lectern or got lost, and had to read from cards over the phone to get a message straight. People want to believe their leadership is telling them the truth, and are gullible as a result.

The media has been parroting the story fed to them by NASA and JPL and the IAU, and why would they NOT? NASA and JPL and the big observatories are staffed with folks who have security clearances, and, as the Zetas said, agree to this as a CONDITION OF HAVING THEIR JOBS. To say nothing of what happens to someone who breaks the clearance oaths. You don't think conspiracies can be perp'd on the people? The last time this issue came up, the Zetas wrote the Conspiracy topic. Time to repost this.

(Begin ZetaTalk[TM] on Conspiracies)
Conspiracies are integral to all 3rd Density existence, as it is natural for intelligent species to attempt to mold the world around them to their liking. A conspiracy is simply a manipulation of the world done in a covert manner, rather than an open attempt to manipulate. In this the 3rd Density entity is attempting to better their chances at success, since those upon whom the conspiracy is foisted are not aware that a manipulation is underway. Humans often assume that a conspiracy needs certain components such as smoke filled back rooms and encrypted communications, but conspiracies take place in such humble places as the family kitchen or the school yard where youngsters play. A wink and a whisper are all that is required, and a conspiracy is in process!

Conspiracies exist in human society, as in all 3rd Density societies where entities are sorting out their orientation to be either Service-to-Self or Service-to-Other, as they are an extension of the desire to manipulate others. Wanting to take a larger share, or wanting to conceal actions that one would be punished for, or wanting to foist a pretense upon others - all these desires lead to conspiracies. Grand conspiracies that get recorded in history books are rare, but the conspiratorial process is common, a daily affair for most humans, in fact. Conspiracies succeed on the small scale, and encourage those who lean strongly in the Service-to-Self orientation to try them on a larger scale. How successful have they been? Secrets of interest worldwide to all peoples have been kept, for decades, even when known by a large number of individuals who would just love to tell the truth. Examples of the success of such conspiracies are:

• the long term FBI chief Hoover's conspiracy to keep his cross-dressing and homosexual life style from the general public. His close associates certainly knew, occasional lovers outside of the FBI certainly knew, and talk of his leanings would have been shared among acquaintances of these individuals in the wildfire manner that rumors are spread about. How did the truth get suppressed for decades until long after his death? By threats of harassment by the FBI and frank blackmail attempts, which succeeded in preventing anyone in the media from cashing in on this juicy bit of gossip.

• the death of John F. Kennedy, murdered by the CIA with more than one hitman, in full view of a nearby crowd of witnesses and broadcasts on TV. The gullible public was told that a single bullet traveled through two bodies, in and out of several organs that were not even lined up with each other, and came out intact. The fact that a single bullet would have lost speed, and fragmented when breaking bones, stands loudly pronouncing that such an explanation is not logical, yet since members of the military and executive branch of government seemed to buy the story, it stands. How did the truth get suppressed for decades, up to and including the present? By the fact that a handful of men in high government positions repeated the lie in solemn tones.

• the bankruptcy of banking systems, such as the Savings and Loan fiasco that took place in the United States during the past decades or the BCCI fiasco. The public stared at the figures, which showed billions gone to fraud, and believed the government line that banking system controls put into place since 1929 would not allow banks to fail. These two frauds took place back to back, perpetrated essentially by the same CIA money laundering crowd seeking a money source for all the secret programs the CIA has run over the years, yet even a repeated performance failed to dampen the public's gullibility. How was the public convinced that solidity was there, seeing something that did not exist? By the human tendency to believe anything that comforts, and deny what discomforts, so that unpleasant untruths are simply ignored.

(End ZetaTalk[TM] on Conspiracies)