| |
|
Article: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected](Nancy )
Subject: Re: Hale-Bopp THEN and NOW (1-6)
Date: 13 Feb 1997 16:34:46 GMT
In article <[email protected]>
Paul Cambell writes:
> Nancy posted a series of predictions that astronomers made
> a while ago. I'm glad she did and I'm also glad that most of
> the predictions came true. Hale-Bopp is big and bright.
> "Paul Campbell" <[email protected]>
Pretty quiet and non-specific for YOU, Paul. Why are you mumbling into your palm? Since you didn't want to get specific, here's some specifics from a fellow Canada resident, posted on their web site in late 1996, and still there. See if you can address the specifics mentioned in this web posting from Canada. I'll post excerpts from that web site as a series so EACH point can be addressed by you as a standalone, giving it the attention it deserves.
ISSUE 3: The supposed fragmentation that the Hale-Bopp fraud was undergoing in late 1995, causing chunks of the nucleus to break off, has now stopped. Is this the way fragmenting comets behave? Out past Jupiter they outgas and fragment and when close to the sun, stop this activity? Isn't this backward?
ISSUE 4: Why doesn't the supposed fragmented chunk of the nucleus ever separate? In fact, the description of what was supposed to be the Hale-Bopp comet in 1995 perfectly fits the description of a nova, with the rapid expansion and then quick fading, the swirling pinwheels and all.
.......
http://www.pe.net/~minnie/shechinah.html
What is the Truth?
The following hypothesis is based upon several months of pouring over numerous documents. Most were found on the WWW and available to all who have access to this medium. There are links within this document to find most of the information. Check it out for yourself.
... Then came the announcement of HaleBopp in mid 1995. ...
The first important picture (fig 2), which I refer to as the "pinwheel", was taken by the space telescope Hubble (HST) in October of '95. ... Now take your compass or engineering ruler and measure from the bottom bright spot around and down to your left, this time following the center of the spiral (the relatively dark area, above the two spots and that passes below them). You'll quickly notice that the spiral, or rather the material making up the spiral DOES NOT EXPAND. Note: If this were a so called "CHUNK" as JPL initially stated, the material would move away from what they refer to as the nucleus(which they say is the lower bright spot), it wouldn't spiral away, it would move straight away and it could be easily visualized by HST. But surprise it doesn't move away. Not even at the speed of 68 miles an hour! (JPL's estimate). And by the way, there hasn't been one image of this so-called CHUNK at any distance from HaleBopp by any telescopes.