ZetaTalk: sci.astro debates: Re: The Hale-Bopp Conspiracy Bureau

Re: The Hale-Bopp Conspiracy Bureau

Article: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected](Nancy )
Subject: Re: The Hale-Bopp Conspiracy Bureau
Date: 24 Jan 1997 15:07:24 GMT

In article <[email protected]> Paul Campbell writes:
> "Hello Mr. Smith. It's been what, 3 months since you first
> applied to observe Comet Hale-Bopp? Let's see your political
> affiliations seem to be acceptable, underwear.... grocery
> purchases... yes it all seems within acceptable parameters.
> Congratulations Mr. Smith, I believe that you will be
> allowed to observe this comet."
> Paul Campbell <[email protected]>

Hilarious dialog, Paul, I'm still chuckling. However, not too realistic as co-conspirators aren't ADVERTISED for in the papers, etc. The Zetas want to say a few words on conspiracies, since you brought the subject up, inappropriate though it may be for sci.astro.

(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
Conspiracies are integral to all 3rd Density existence, as it is natural for intelligent species to attempt to mold the world around them to their liking. A conspiracy is simply a manipulation of the world done in a covert manner, rather than an open attempt to manipulate. In this the 3rd Density entity is attempting to better their chances at success, since those upon whom the conspiracy is foisted are not AWARE that a manipulation is underway. Humans often assume that a conspiracy needs certain components such as smoke filled back rooms and encrypted communications, but conspiracies take place in such humble places as the family kitchen or the school yard where youngsters play. A wink and a whisper are all that is required, and a conspiracy is in process!

Conspiracies exist in human society, as in all 3rd Density societies where entities are sorting out their orientation to be either Service-to-Self or Service-to-Other, as they are an extension of the desire to manipulate others. Wanting to take a larger share, or wanting to conceal actions that one would be punished for, or wanting to foist a pretense upon others - all these desires lead to conspiracies. Grand conspiracies that get recorded in history books are rare, but the conspiratorial process is common, a daily affair for most humans, in fact. Conspiracies succeed on the small scale, and encourage those who lean strongly in the Service-to-Self orientation to try them on a larger scale. How successful have they been? Secrets of interest worldwide to all peoples have been kept, for decades, even when known by a large number of individuals who would just love to tell the truth. Examples of the success of such conspiracies are:

the long term FBI chief Hoover's conspiracy to keep his cross-dressing and homosexual life style from the general public. His close associates certainly knew, occasional lovers outside of the FBI certainly knew, and talk of his leanings would have been shared among acquaintances of these individuals in the wildfire manner that rumors are spread about. How did the truth get suppressed for decades until long after his death? By threats of harassment by the FBI and frank blackmail attempts, which succeeded in preventing anyone in the media from cashing in on this juicy bit of gossip.

the death of John F. Kennedy, murdered by the CIA with more than ONE hitman, if full view of a nearby crowd of witnesses and broadcasts on TV. The gullible public was told that a single bullet traveled through two bodies, in and out of several organs that were not even lined up with each other, and came out intact. The fact that a single bullet would have lost speed, and fragmented when breaking bones, stands loudly pronouncing that such an explanation is NOT LOGICAL, yet since members of the military and executive branch of government seemed to buy the story, it stands. How did the truth get suppressed for decades, up to and including the present? By the fact that a handful of men in high government positions repeated the lie in solemn tones.

the bankruptcy of banking systems, such as the Saving and Loan fiasco that took place in the United States during the past decades or the BCCI fiasco. The public stared at the figures, which showed billions gone to fraud, and believed the government line that banking system controls put into place since 1929 would not allow banks to fail. These two frauds took place back to back, perpetrated essentially by the same CIA money laundering crowd seeking a money source for all the secret programs the CIA has run over the years, yet even a REPEATED PERFORMANCE failed to dampen the public's gullibility. How was the public convinced that solidity was there, seeing something that DID NOT EXIST? By the human tendency to believe anything that comforts, and deny what discomforts, so that unpleasant untruths are simply ignored.