| |
|
Article: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected](Nancy )
Subject: Re: GRAVITY - the Zetas Explain
Date: 16 Jan 1997 15:29:47 GMT
In article <[email protected]> Greg Neill
writes:
>>>> In article <[email protected]> Greg Neill
writes:
>>>>> Newton's theory of Gravitation fits those
fact nicely.
>>>>> [email protected] (Greg Neill)
>>>>
>>>> (Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
>>>> What Newton did was DESCRIBE this balance,
>>>> not explain it.
>>>> (End ZetaTalk[TM])
>>>
>>> And if the discription is perfectly adequate without
>>> cluttering it up with extraneous mystery forces and
>>> sweeping vorticies of force, why do so?
>>> [email protected] (Greg Neill)
>>
> >Nancy ([email protected]) wrote:
>> Sounds like a call to return to the Dark Ages to me!
>
> If anything, your invocation of unseen forces and
> unwillingness to consider objective facts and evidence are
> a blatent sign of your own medieval tendencies.
> [email protected] (Greg Neill)
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
We are back to worship, on bended knee to the god Newton. We have
pointed out that Newton's explanations are NOT adequate, and
offered countering explanations that DO address the
contradictions and holes in the current human theories. Rather
than admit that these contradictions exist, or holes where humans
just turn away and look elsewhere, Greg has pulled the blinders
down over his eyes and is repeating a mantra - "Newton fits
the facts, Newton fits the facts, Newton fits the facts."
Your argument is demonstrating only one thing, Greg - that you
are unable to deal with the contradictions and prefer the comfort
of denial. Sorry you're unable to think independently, Greg.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])