| |
|
Article: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected](Nancy )
Subject: Re: GRAVITY - the Zetas Explain
Date: 16 Jan 1997 15:30:33 GMT
In article <[email protected]>
>> (Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
>> You are presenting two sides of a math equation, in
essence,
>> that was DESIGNED to balance! THAT'S why the two
>> calculated forces agree.
>
> The centrepital force relationship can be easily measured in
> experiments here on earth (high school students do this with
> string, weight, and spring scale). I then showed how, based
> upon actual data from our solar system, the two forces
happen
> to balance for each of the planets.
> [email protected] (Greg Neill)
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
High school experiments with centrifugal force are NOT
scientific, nor do they in any way measure the equality in
forces! You HAVE no data on the equality of forces between a
planet and its sun. What are the differences between the high
school experiment you describe and planet revolutions, and why is
this non-scientific? 1) In the high school experiment gravity is
pulling to the side, not the center, 2) the centrifugal force is
continually reinforced by pulling from the student's arm, 3) the
pulling by the student's arm is not measured, 4) the simulated
gravity attraction of a sun is done by a string that is fixed and
cannot reflect variability.
You complain about OUR lack of dealing with facts, Greg, and
then use this example to bolster you claim that Newton explained
all adequately! Get a grip!
(End ZetaTalk[TM])
In article <[email protected]>
>> Newton had no other explanation for why the planets
>> continued in their orbits save for what he termed
centrifugal
>> force, so he made this EQUAL to the force of gravity. In
his
>> day the ability to take precise measurements was not
possible.
>
> Have you every seen the data collected by Tycho Brahe on the
> orbit of Mars? Quite precise enough for Kepler to plot the
orbit
> and determine that it was an ellipse.
> [email protected] (Greg Neill)
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
What does the price of tea have to do with any of this? We
described an experiment in a vacuum chamber, where a centered
object, spinning was dropped and the centrifugal force measured
precisely as it did so. What you call the centrifugal force DIED
as it dropped, without friction from air pressure to use as the
usual standard excuse. This means that Newton's balanced equation
was a DESCRIPTION of what he saw in the heavens, not an
explanation for what was happening, regardless of how detailed
his description is.
Address THAT, not the price of tea.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])