link to Home Page

Re: GRAVITY - the Zetas Explain


Article: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected](Nancy )
Subject: Re: GRAVITY - the Zetas Explain
Date: 13 Jan 1997 01:49:30 GMT

In article <[email protected]> Greg Neill writes:
> here is a quick argument based upon real data which counters
> some of the statements she made in a recent post. In particular,
> her insistance that there is a repulsive component to the
> gravitational field, and that the planets remain in orbit only
> because of some mysterious "sweepin arms of force" eminating
> from the Sun.
>
> From the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 63rd addition,
> I have extracted data for the Sun and planets for orbital radius
> (actually, the semimajor axis), the orbital velocity, and mass.
>
> [detail snipped and placed at bottom of post]
>
> Now, Notice how closely the two calculated forces agree, even
> with our simplifying assumptions. ... Now Nancy, where is
> there room for yourmysterious repulsive gravitational forces and
> sweeping arms of force eminating from the Sun? I think
> everyone can agree that they have disappeared in a puff of logic.
> [email protected] (Greg Neill)

(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
You are presenting two sides of a math equation, in essence, that was DESIGNED to balance! THAT'S why the two calculated forces agree. Newton had no other explanation for why the planets continued in their orbits save for what he termed centrifugal force, so he made this EQUAL to the force of gravity. In his day the ability to take precise measurements was not possible. In Newton's day even the vacuum was unavailable, so an experiment in a tall column with all possible air removed was not possible. He could not discover, as discover he would have, that in a vacuum a centered object spinning around a heavier object in the center DOES NOT retain a centrifugal force that continues unabated. It STOPS. In Newton's day such an arrangement was assumed to be influenced by the friction of air.

Leave your god Newton and do your OWN thinking!
(End ZetaTalk[TM])

In article <[email protected]> Greg Neill wrote:
> Fc = (Mp*V^2)/R
>
> Fg = (G*Ms*Mp)/(R^2)
>
> Where: Mp is the mass of the planet
> Ms is the mass of the Sun
> R is the orbital radius
> G is Newton's Universal Gravitational Constant:
> = 6.67204E-11 newton-meter^2/kg^2
>

>   Orbital Orbital   Centrepital Gravitational
>   Radius Velocity Mass Force Force
> Planet (km) (km/sec) (kg) (Newtons) (Newtons)
> -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
> Sun -- -- 1.991E30 -- --
> Mercury 5.795E10 47.83 3.181E23 1.256E22 1.258E22
> Venus 1.081E11 35.02 4.883E24 5.539E22 5.550E22
> Earth 1.496E11 29.77 5.979E24 3.543E22 3.550E22
> Mars 2.278E11 24.12 6.418E23 1.639E21 1.642E21
> Jupiter 7.781E11 13.05 1.901E27 4.160E23 4.171E23
> Saturn 1.427E12 9.639 5.684E26 3.701E22 3.708E22
> Uranus 2.870E12 6.796 8.682E25 1.397E21 1.400E21
> Neptune 4.499E12 5.428 1.027E26 6.724E20 6.737E20

>[email protected] (Greg Neill)