Article:
<[email protected]>
From: [email protected](Nancy )
Subject: Re: Planet REVOLUTIONS - the Zetas Explain
Date: 30 Dec 1996 15:12:14 GMT
In article <[email protected]>
Eric Kline states
>> (Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
>> ZetaTalk: Planet Revolutions
>
> The slow motion of planets around the Sun has long puzzled
> mankind, who are acutely aware that without continuing
> impetus to motion, motion STOPS.
>
> Newton's first law. An object in motion stays in motion
unless
> acted upon by a force. The planets stay in motion becuase
there
> is no force to slow them.
> eric kline <[email protected]>
(Begin Zetatalk[TM])
The gravity of the Sun is not such a force? Perturbations, which
are measurable, are not such a force? Take your theories out of
the separate boxes you house them in, where they are not allowed
to interfere with each other, and contemplate them TOGETHER! What
factor in Newton's laws allow a planet to return to its
pre-perturbation orbit? At that moment, when it is perturbed and
has ASSUMED a new orbit, what factor in Newton's laws govern its
RETURN? There ARE no factors, proving that this so called law is
just a description of part of the picture.
One could state that humans don't need to eat,
get along find without fuel, and as long as the fact that humans
regularly sit down to table and stuff things into their mouths is
ignored and not placed alongside this statement, or as long as
countries where stick thin starving humans are pitching dead into
the side of the road as they stagger toward the relief lines is
not placed alongside this statement - the statement is TRUE. This
is where you're at, here, with Newton's so called laws! If the
law can't survive when faced with the facts, then it is NOT a LAW
of nature!
(End ZetaTalk[TM])