| |
|
Article:
<[email protected]>
From: [email protected](Nancy )
Subject: Re: Eric Kline CANNOT DEFEND his Newton Argument -
Response # 2
Date: 25 Dec 1996 02:14:20 GMT
In article <[email protected]>
> Yes, let's. You claim to be in telepathic communication with
> friendly aliens who couldn't pass a junior high school
science exam.
> No one believes you Nancy because you are full of shit.
> So you and your idiot zetatalk can just go take a hike.
> You are a liar, and we needn't grant your arguments the
least
> recognition.
> We don't have to deal with what your supposed zetas have to
say,
> because YOU have ZERO credibility.
> So buzz off. Maybe the zetas can give Santa Claus some
advice
> on avionics.
> Henry Warwick <[email protected]>
Ah, distraction and diversion. Meaning that Henry Warwich can't defend Eric Kline's Newton Argument EITHER.